S-213At consideration in committee in the Senate

Law to Protect Judges from Political Interference

Protecting Judges from Interference

Introduced Nov 23, 2021·Last discussed Apr 26, 2022

Summary

This proposed law wants to change the rules about how we treat judges. Right now, it's already against the law to try to mess with a judge's decision by threatening them. This proposed law would make those rules even stronger. It would be a crime to threaten, intimidate, or try to influence a judge, their family, or their property. This proposed law affects everyone in Canada. It sets a clear line about what you can and cannot do when you disagree with a judge's decision. It especially affects people who might be tempted to take their anger out on judges. This proposed law matters because it helps keep our court system fair. Judges need to be able to make decisions without fear. If they are worried about their safety or their family's safety, it could affect their judgment. This proposed law helps protect judges so they can do their jobs properly. This makes sure everyone gets a fair trial.

Where This Lands on Key Issues

Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about

Crime & Public SafetyStronger law enforcement

The bill focuses on protecting judges through stricter penalties for threats and intimidation, aligning with a 'tough on crime' approach.

National Security & DefenceMeet NATO commitments

Protecting judges can be seen as a component of national security, as it ensures the stability and integrity of the judicial system. This bill could be seen as a minor enhancement to the security apparatus.

This bill

Bill Quality

Solid

This proposed law aims to give judges more flexibility in sentencing, especially when minimum sentences are involved. However, it leaves some room for interpretation and may not fully address all concerns about fair sentencing.

Things to Watch For

It is unclear how often judges will choose alternatives to minimum sentences.
The law doesn't define what makes an alternative "just and reasonable."
The impact on victims of crime is only mentioned in one specific instance.
There could be inconsistencies in sentencing across different regions or judges.
The change to jury recommendations in murder cases might not have a big impact in practice.

Progress

Click any step to learn what it means