Parliament returns Monday, April 13
Back to Bills
S-221At second reading in the Senate

Law Changes Governor General's Retirement Package

Changes to Governor General's Retirement

Introduced Nov 23, 2021·Last discussed Apr 7, 2022
Summary

This proposed law wants to change the rules about pensions and other benefits for former Governors General of Canada. Right now, when a Governor General leaves office, they get a yearly pension for the rest of their life. This proposed law would change how that pension is calculated, potentially reducing the amount of money they receive. It might also change other benefits they currently get, like travel expenses or office support. This change would directly affect anyone who has served as Governor General in the past, and anyone who will serve in that role in the future. It also indirectly affects all Canadian taxpayers, since the money for these pensions and benefits comes from public funds. This proposed law matters because it deals with how we compensate people who hold one of the highest positions in the country. Some people might think the current benefits are too generous, while others might argue they are necessary to maintain the dignity of the office. This change could save taxpayers money, but it could also impact the kind of people who are willing to take on the role of Governor General.

Where This Lands on Key Issues

Where this proposed law falls on the policy spectrums that Canadians care about

Taxes & Government SpendingBalance taxes with needed services

Changes to Governor General pensions could slightly reduce government spending, though the overall impact is likely minimal.

This bill
Bill Quality
Solid

This proposed law ensures that former Governors General must serve at least five years to receive a pension, unless they are unable to do so for medical reasons. It also stops administrative support and expense reimbursement for those who served less than five years, but protects existing survivor benefits.

Things to Watch For

  • The definition of 'administrative support' and 'expenses' is not specified, potentially leading to disputes.
  • The criteria for determining 'medical reasons' preventing a five-year term are not detailed, leaving room for interpretation.
  • The law does not address other potential benefits or perks beyond annuities, administrative support, and expense reimbursement.
Progress

Click any step to learn what it means

What Do You Think?

Loading...

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments...