Patrick Bonin
- Career
- Environmental activist
- Political Experience
- Elected Member of Parliament for Repentigny in the 2025 Canadian federal election. Elected vice chair of the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development in the 45th Canadian Parliament in 2025.
Where Patrick falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
Total votes cast: 63,015
Mr. Speaker, Quebec has everything to gain from quickly moving away from oil and gas. Over $10 billion per year is leaving Quebec on oil purchases alone. Ontario, Saskatchewan, Alberta, the Conservatives, oil companies and auto manufacturers are all working against electrification. We hope that this government will stand up and propose measures to help Quebec break free of oil and gas, rather [more]
Mr. Speaker, in our view, the Conservatives' proposal is utterly backward. Quebec is a leader in transportation electrification, and it needs the federal government's support. That means implementing ambitious measures, but the government's latest auto strategy is not ambitious, unfortunately. In terms of targets, it is not enough. There is also absolutely nothing in it about medium- and [more]
Mr. Speaker, there are currently 130,000 jobs in the electric mobility sector in this country and many of those jobs are in Quebec. That number is expected to triple by 2035. Quebec does not manufacture gas-powered vehicles. It manufactures electric buses, light-duty electric trucks, heavy-duty electric trucks, trains and streetcars. Quebec can do that and is interested in developing the [more]
Mr. Speaker, I would like to start by saying that the Bloc Québécois does not support the Conservative Party's motion. In fact, by moving yet another motion on the auto sector, the Conservatives are unfortunately confusing the interests of Ontarians with the interests of Quebeckers. They are also protecting the interests of Canadian auto manufacturers, which are lagging behind internationally [more]
Mr. Speaker, I would like my colleague to talk about the investor-state dispute settlement, which, among other things, allows investors to sue states directly before an international tribunal. In the North American Free Trade Agreement, there was a provision in Chapter 11 that was removed when the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement was renewed in 2020. This chapter was abolished so that [more]
Mr. Speaker, I would like to add to what my colleague said earlier. We share some concerns about things like agriculture and meat. My Bloc Québécois colleague proposed an amendment in committee that would essentially have required the bill to be conditional on a sanitary and phytosanitary agreement with the U.K. to ensure that Canadian meat can get into the U.K. Can my colleague explain why his [more]
Has your office or your staff met with people from Marinvest?
I come back to the 20 pages. A 20‑page project was submitted.
I understand, okay. You say there's no project, but 20 pages were submitted to the agency. Are you prepared to share them with the committee, to make them available to us?
No, there wasn't—
You're prepared to have the same kind of agreement in Quebec as in Alberta. Exactly the same format.