Randy Hoback
- Born
- December 19, 1967 — Prince Albert, Saskatchewan
- Family
- Married with two children
- Education
- Business administration certificate from the University of Saskatchewan and Chartered Director's designation from McMaster University and the Conference Board of Canada
- Career
- Worked for farm machinery manufacturer Flexicoil and later Case New Holland from 1986 to 2000, purchased the family farm in 2000
- Political Experience
- Elected to represent the electoral district of Prince Albert in 2008. Re-elected in 2011, 2015, 2019, 2021 and 2025. Chairman of the Western Canadian Wheat Growers Association (WCWGA). Member of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, a member of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-food, and the Standing Committee on Finance. Chair of the Standing Committee on International Trade. Chair of the Saskatchewan Conservative Caucus. Vice Chair of the Standing Committee on International Trade. Chair and President of ParlAmericas.
- Property
- Family farm
- Notable
- Endorsed Peter MacKay in the 2020 Conservative Party of Canada leadership election.
Where Randy falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
Randy Hoback won with 27,763 votes (71.5%)
Total votes cast: 38,844
Mr. Speaker, if I remember that bill, it was an ominous bill that had all sorts of things in it, including that. When we put a piece of pie in with a bunch of garbage, it is still a bunch of garbage. We do not get the chance to separate the piece of pie. There are things the member said that I would agree with, vote for and say they are good investments in Canada. However, the way the Liberals [more]
Mr. Speaker, we need the Ring of Fire. The reality is that for the types of goods and products we are producing into the future, the elements sitting in the Ring of Fire have to come to market. Either we bring them to market or the Chinese are going to bring them to market. If we want economic independence and the ability to take care of ourselves and our allies, the Ring of Fire becomes very [more]
Prime Minister Mr. Speaker, I applaud theif that is actually what he ends up doing at the end of the day, once he proves to me that he has shovels in the ground and is doing it. However, where have you been for the last 10 years? How did we get into such a bad deficit situation in the last 10 years? Where have you been? The same Liberal members are sitting over there with a different guy leading [more]
Mr. Speaker, I thought I could sneak that in there. Conservative leader If there was a Conservative prime minister, I know he would be going around the world opening up those markets and rebuilding those relationships. That would be a top priority. In fact, we will see thego to the U.S. next week and do exactly that. He will talk about how Canada is such a great place to invest in and a great [more]
Mr. Speaker, the member laid out an example that I am not familiar with. I do not know the details and cannot answer the question effectively. The member and I are going to dispute investor state dispute settlements, because she looks at it through a different window than I do. I look at it as the mechanism for making sure that things are done fairly, equally and properly, and that everybody is [more]
Mr. Speaker, I really feel honoured to catch your eye. It is a privilege for me to be here on a Thursday afternoon and know that the Speaker has my back. C-13 I think everybody agrees that Billshould go through. It is common sense. It should be almost like a routine item. I am going to talk about some of the frustrations that we have with the U.K. wanting to join the TPP. I think it is good that [more]
Mr. Speaker, that is a great question. I am in favour of ISDR when it makes sense to have an investor-state dispute mechanism. When we looked at removing chapter 11, the history of it and the number of disputes, the amount paid out versus the amount of trade we actually did was very small. The percentage was so small it was unreal. When we looked at what was being paid out, the reality is that [more]
Mr. Speaker, there is a lot in that question. The member talked about the Alto train and the $90 billion, which will probably be $150 billion and which will probably be $200 billion by the time it is actually built and completed, where the average ticket cost will probably be around $2,000 one way in a corridor that actually is already being served by bus, existing rail and airplane. If the [more]