Ruby Sahota
- Born
- June 22, 1979 — Toronto
- Family
- Married to Dr. Tejinder Sahota, has a son named Nihal
- Education
- Honours bachelor's degree in Political Science and Peace Studies at McMaster University in 2003; Cooley Law School, graduating in 2007
- Career
- Practiced law in Cleveland, Ohio, focusing on commercial litigation from 2007 to 2012
- Political Experience
- Elected to House of Commons in 2015, Minister of Democratic Institutions from 2024 to 2025, Chief Government Whip from January to December 2024, Secretary of State (Combatting Crime)
- Notable
- Her father was the Chairman of the Ontario Sikhs and Gurdwara Council
Where Ruby falls on key policy spectrums
Your Money
People & Society
How We're Governed
Land & Community
C-12 C-2 Mr. Speaker, control in our immigration system is very important. I agree with that. This is why the government has been taking several different measures. The Auditor General's report just came out recently. It recognizes gaps in the system. However, those are gaps that were recognized by our government, hence the introduction of Bill, which was originally in Billand tabled back in June [more]
Mr. Speaker, there are many other countries, such as in Europe, the U.K. and the United States, that limit asylum claims to a one-year time period. I think some of the member's speech generalized and said that Canada would no longer give due process to asylum claimants. That is untrue. People who enter the country and wish to claim asylum would have an ample, one-year time period to put their [more]
Mr. Speaker, we do have a plan. That is why we listed the IRGC as a terrorist entity. This provides our law enforcement and the CBSA with the tools to hold people inadmissible in our country and then remove them. The CBSA is working through the files and is removing those with links to the IRGC. This is the plan. Along with that, we are protecting our institutions. We just made an announcement [more]
Mr. Speaker, this bill was debated at the second reading stage. For those watching, the second reading stage is before the bill even goes to committee, and even at that time, there were several Conservative members who spoke against the bill and had lots of reservations about the bill. Now they claim that the only time they had reservations was when the freedom of religion defence came up in [more]
Mr. Speaker, there were many questions brought up by members of the committee. The discussion happened amongst all members of the committee. That is my clarification for that. Plus, it is so essential that we ban these hate symbols that are used to intimidate and promote terrorism in our country. The Conservatives are against that. Why is that?
Mr. Speaker, anything that I mentioned in my speech is a matter of public record. Nothing I have said has been false. It has all been documented, whether it is on record at the committee stage or in past statements made by Conservative members, which are well documented, either on radio airwaves or in articles. I stand by everything I have said.
Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle Mr. Speaker, I will be splitting my time with the member for. Every Canadian should be able to walk into their place of worship, send their children to school or gather in their community without fear. They should not have to look over their shoulder or wonder whether someone outside is shouting threats, blocking the entrance or intimidating them simply because of who they [more]
Madam Speaker, that was a very interesting speech. I met with several synagogues over this last week, especially the ones that were affected by the shootings in Toronto, and the Toronto Islamic Centre, which has been threatened with a mass shooting similar to what we saw in New Zealand. These are horrific incidents of hate that we are seeing across our country. It seems like the member is saying, [more]