Parliament returns Monday, April 13
Liberal

Ryan Turnbull

LiberalWhitbyOntario
1015Votes Cast
20Speeches
0Bills Sponsored
Background
Born
1977
Committee Memberships
Finance(FINA)
Member
Where Ryan Stands

Where Ryan falls on key policy spectrums

They vote

Your Money

Taxes & Government SpendingBusiness & Worker RulesEnergy & the Economy

People & Society

HealthcareImmigrationIndigenous PeoplesIdentity & Human RightsEducation & ChildcareDrug Policy

How We're Governed

National Security & DefencePolitical & Electoral ReformCrime & Public SafetyFirearms

Land & Community

Environment, Climate & ResourcesHousing & Cost of LivingRural Communities & Culture
They vote
Riding
House Seat
2025 Election Results — Whitby

Ryan Turnbull won with 35,624 votes (52.7%)

Ryan Turnbull(Liberal)35,624 (52.7%)
Steve Yamada(Conservative)29,620 (43.8%)
Kevin Goswell(NDP-New Democratic Party)1,638 (2.4%)
Andrew Di Lullo(Green Party)506 (0.7%)
Nouman Mian(Centrist)206 (0.3%)

Total votes cast: 67,594

Recent Activity
Mar 26, 2026
DebateCommunity Support in Whitby

Mr. Speaker, I could not be more proud to support our region, town and community partners in compassionately and effectively addressing homelessness in our community. The site at 1635 Dundas Street East is a lifeline in Whitby, a place where people facing some of their hardest moments can find safety, care and dignity. Our new government is backing that critical work with a $40-million [more]

Mar 25, 2026
AnswerTaxation

Mr. Speaker, we acknowledge that oil price shocks due to the war in the Middle East are rippling across the world and increasing the cost of living pressures on Canadians here at home. That is why we recently worked with our international partners to release hundreds of millions of barrels of Canadian oil as part of an effort to provide stability for businesses and consumers. We cannot unblock [more]

Mar 25, 2026

Yes. Thank you, Chair. I'm really glad that we were able to resolve the issue that was in contention at the last meeting. I didn't think we were that far apart, but we were looking for a solution. We have since resolved that. The legislative clerk has notified me that there was a slight issue of clarification with the French translation of the version that we had sent along, and we now have a [more]

Mar 25, 2026

I think the attempt at a solution that we discussed last time, when we were at this slight impasse, was to identify, in every case in the registry where there was information that was not being disclosed, whether the reason for the redaction or the non-disclosure of that information was that it was personal information, confidential information or sensitive information. I think there are those [more]

Mar 25, 2026

Thanks, Chair. I'll read the following motion into the record. It's amendment G‑4. It is that Bill C‑230 be amended by adding after line 13 on page 3 the following new clause: “Coordinating Amendments Bill C‑15 8(1) Subsections (2) and (3) apply if Bill C‑15, introduced in the 1st session of the 45th Parliament and entitled Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1 (in this section referred to as [more]

Mar 24, 2026
AnswerAutomotive Industry

Mr. Speaker, we know nostalgia is not a strategy. We cannot go back to 1965, to a tariff-free auto pact. What has Unifor said about the Conservatives' so-called plan? It said this plan cannot achieve its intended objectives, it is mathematically incorrect, and it may prevent potential future growth in our automotive industry. Unlike them, we actually sit down with the workers and the unions and [more]

Mar 23, 2026

I was going to make a comment. I don't know if I have an answer to that. This is similar to the point Mr. Lemire just made. I assumed, when reading this bill and the amendments we were proposing, that there would be very few cases in this registry with no information provided at all. You heard the officials say it could be in part or in whole, so I guess that raises the concern. In my mind, if [more]

Mar 23, 2026

Thank you, Chair. Do I understand correctly that BQ-1 had a line conflict, so it was not admissible? Okay. Thank you very much. I will move the following amendment. It's G-2 in your package. C-230 The amendment is that Bill, in clause 1, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 1 to line 7 on page 2 with the following: poration, trust company or partnership; (b) the amount that was remitted, [more]

Mar 23, 2026

If I may, that was the intent I read into this. We could clarify it here in committee, which would inform CRA's practices in the future. Is that right? I don't know if Mr. Chambers and Mr. Lemire think what I have proposed is satisfactory, but I would be agreeable to that.

Mar 23, 2026

Thank you very much.

Mar 23, 2026

It's a good question. What's hard for me to determine, off the top, is exactly what is required in terms of the naming in the registry. The language in the amendment suggests, to me, that it wouldn't be an arbitrary decision. There are definitions of what is confidential, personal and sensitive information, but I'd like to ask the officials to perhaps clarify whether my interpretation is correct [more]