Parliament returns Monday, April 13
Vote #49November 7, 2025

This vote is about changing the budget because it doesn't help Quebec enough with healthcare, seniors' benefits, carbon pricing, and climate change.

Defeated30 Yeas
306 Nays

What They Voted On

That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “the House reject the government's budget statement, which will hurt Quebec because it fails to: (a) raise the Canadian health transfer escalator to 6%; (b) end discrimination against people aged 65 to 74 who did not receive an equitable increase in Old Age Security; (c) repay the $814 million to Quebeckers who were not compensated for the end of carbon pricing in April 2025; and (d) propose concrete and effective measures to combat climate change”.

What This Vote Is Really About

This vote is about whether the Canadian government's budget plan is good for Quebec. The people voting don't think the budget helps Quebec enough. They are unhappy because the budget doesn't give Quebec enough money for healthcare. They also think older people in Quebec aren't getting enough money from Old Age Security. The vote also mentions money Quebec lost from carbon pricing and says the budget doesn't do enough to fight climate change. If this vote passes, it means the government has to go back and change the budget to better help Quebec. This could mean more money for healthcare, seniors, and climate change programs in Quebec. Citizens should care because this vote could affect the services and support they receive from the government.

How Canada Voted
How the House Voted

Hover over a seat to see details, click to view the member's profile.

Speaker
Speaker's Left
Speaker's Right
Yea (30)
Nay (303)
Did not vote (7)
Did Not Vote (7)
Conservative: 4Liberal: 3
Carol Anstey (Conservative)
Buckley Belanger (Liberal)
Michael Chong (Conservative)
Laila Goodridge (Conservative)
Matt Jeneroux (Liberal)
Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal)
Shannon Stubbs (Conservative)