Parliament returns Monday, April 13
Vote #72February 25, 2026

This vote is about whether the government should cut healthcare and other benefits for asylum seekers to save money and prioritize citizens, while also tracking and reporting spending and deporting criminals.

Defeated134 Yeas
198 Nays

What They Voted On

That, given that, (i) the cost of the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP) has more than quadrupled in the last four years, from $211 million to $896 million, (ii) the cost of the IFHP is projected to rise to $1.5 billion by 2029-2030, (iii) the IFHP provides non-citizens with failed asylum claims access to benefits that Canadian citizens do not have free access to, including vision care, (iv) Canadians that have paid into the healthcare system their whole lives are unable to get the healthcare they deserve in part because resources are going to false asylum claimants, the House call on the government to: (a) review federal benefits provided to asylum claimants in order to find savings for taxpayers; (b) restrict federal benefits received by rejected asylum claimants to emergency lifesaving healthcare only; (c) provide transparency on federal spending on the IFHP by providing an annual report to Parliament, particularly regarding supplementary benefits which Canadian citizens do not have access to; and (d) pass policies to immediately expel foreign nationals convicted of serious crime in Canada.

What This Vote Is Really About

This vote is about whether the government should change the healthcare benefits and other support given to people seeking asylum in Canada. Right now, the government provides some healthcare and other benefits to asylum seekers through a program called the Interim Federal Health Program. The people who proposed this vote are concerned that the program is costing too much money. They also believe that some asylum seekers are getting benefits that Canadian citizens don't even have. They want the government to cut back on these benefits, especially for people whose asylum claims have been rejected. They also want people who commit serious crimes to be deported quickly. If this vote passes, the government would be asked to review the benefits given to asylum seekers, limit those benefits for rejected claimants, report on the program's costs, and deport criminals faster. This could mean less support for asylum seekers and stricter rules about who gets to stay in Canada. Citizens should care because it affects how taxpayer money is spent and how Canada treats people seeking refuge.

How Canada Voted
How the House Voted

Hover over a seat to see details, click to view the member's profile.

Speaker
Speaker's Left
Speaker's Right
Yea (134)
Nay (198)
Did not vote (8)
Did Not Vote (8)
Conservative: 7Liberal: 1
Jim Bélanger (Conservative)
Michael Chong (Conservative)
Connie Cody (Conservative)
Mike Dawson (Conservative)
Amarjeet Gill (Conservative)
Amanpreet Gill (Conservative)
Francis Scarpaleggia (Liberal)
Tim Uppal (Conservative)